Skip to content
Menu
Groups & Networks
Regions
Region Co-Chair Resources
Special Interest Groups
SIG Co-Chair Resources
Research Networks
BORN
CORNET
PRIS
Committees
National Academy of Distinguished Educators in Pediatrics (NADEP)
Online Community
Affinity Groups
Programs & Awards
APA Opportunities Hub
Faculty Development Programs
Research Funding Programs
Collaborative Research Awards Program
RAPID Scholar Awards
Young Investigator Awards Program
Catalyst Career Development Program
Mentorship Programs
New Century Scholars Resident Mentoring Program
Speed Mentoring
NADEP UIM Mentoring Program
RAPID Mentoring and Career Development Conference
Awards
Journal & Resources
Academic Pediatrics Journal
Webinar Library
Advocacy
Advocacy Skills-Building Campaign
Pediatric Policy Council
Public Policy & Advocacy Committee Learning Collaborative
Anti-Racism & Equity Toolkit
APA Resources by Career Level
Connect Mobile App
News & Blog
Job Board
Meetings & Events
Event Calendar
Pediatric Academic Societies (PAS) Meeting
Pediatric Hospital Medicine (PHM) Meeting
Regional Meetings
Fellows and Trainee Conference
QI Meeting
Fellowships
Applying for a Fellowship Program
Fellowship Program Accreditation
About
Mission and Vision
Membership
Join APA
Staff
Board of Directors
Strategic Plan
Donate
Contact
Search for:
Join
Renew
Online Community
Job Board
Donate
Contact
Member Login
Menu
Groups & Networks
Regions
Region Co-Chair Resources
Special Interest Groups
SIG Co-Chair Resources
Research Networks
BORN
CORNET
PRIS
Committees
National Academy of Distinguished Educators in Pediatrics (NADEP)
Online Community
Affinity Groups
Programs & Awards
APA Opportunities Hub
Faculty Development Programs
Research Funding Programs
Collaborative Research Awards Program
RAPID Scholar Awards
Young Investigator Awards Program
Catalyst Career Development Program
Mentorship Programs
New Century Scholars Resident Mentoring Program
Speed Mentoring
NADEP UIM Mentoring Program
RAPID Mentoring and Career Development Conference
Awards
Journal & Resources
Academic Pediatrics Journal
Webinar Library
Advocacy
Advocacy Skills-Building Campaign
Pediatric Policy Council
Public Policy & Advocacy Committee Learning Collaborative
Anti-Racism & Equity Toolkit
APA Resources by Career Level
Connect Mobile App
News & Blog
Job Board
Meetings & Events
Event Calendar
Pediatric Academic Societies (PAS) Meeting
Pediatric Hospital Medicine (PHM) Meeting
Regional Meetings
Fellows and Trainee Conference
QI Meeting
Fellowships
Applying for a Fellowship Program
Fellowship Program Accreditation
About
Mission and Vision
Membership
Join APA
Staff
Board of Directors
Strategic Plan
Donate
Contact
Search for:
THRIVE Faculty Scoring Rubric
Home
/
THRIVE Faculty Scoring Rubric
2027 THRIVE Faculty Scoring Rubric
Reviewer Name
(Required)
First
Last
Applicant Name
First
Last
Please rate the applicant on the following questions.
Why are you interested in becoming a faculty member in the APA THRIVE Program?
(Required)
4 - Excellent: Articulates a specific, compelling motivation clearly tied to THRIVE's mission. Demonstrates understanding of the program's goals and shows genuine personal/professional alignment.
3 - Good: Motivation is clearly stated and relevant. Some connection to THRIVE's mission, though may lack specificity or depth.
2 - Developing: Motivation is present but vague or generic. Limited evidence of understanding THRIVE's specific mission or how it fits the applicant's goals.
1 - Insufficient: Motivation is unclear, missing, or not meaningfully connected to vitality/well-being or faculty development.
VITALITY SCORE: What relevant expertise and experience in vitality/well-being and/or in facilitation/workshop delivery would you bring as faculty in the THRIVE program?
(Required)
4 - Excellent: Demonstrates experience at the national level. Includes concrete roles, credentials, or accomplishments.
3 - Good: Demonstrates experience at the regional level. Roles and accomplishments are described, though depth or breadth could be stronger.
2 - Developing: Demonstrates experience at the local level, but experience appears limited, early-stage.
1 - Insufficient: Minimal or no relevant experience in vitality/wellness. Applicant appears to be a novice.
EDUCATOR SCORE: What relevant expertise and experience in vitality/well-being and/or in facilitation/workshop delivery would you bring as faculty in the THRIVE program?
(Required)
4 - Excellent: Demonstrates experience at the national level in facilitation or workshop delivery. Includes concrete roles, credentials, or accomplishments.
3 - Good: Demonstrates experience at the regional level. Roles and accomplishments are described, though depth or breadth could be stronger.
2 - Developing: Demonstrates experience at the local level, but experience appears limited, early-stage, or primarily local.
1 - Insufficient: Minimal or no relevant experience in facilitation or workshop delivery. Applicant appears to be a novice.
How will you contribute to the diversity of the THRIVE faculty community?
(Required)
2 - Good: Addresses diversity in a meaningful way. Specific and relevant, with depth or breadth.
1 - Developing: Response acknowledges diversity but is vague or narrowly defined. Limited reflection on how the applicant's presence adds to program breadth.
0 - Insufficient: Response is missing, tokenistic, or does not address diversity in a substantive way.
Δ
Scroll To Top