Educator Portfolio: Template
EDUCATOR PORTFOLIO TEMPLATE
YOUR
Educational Philosophy and Five-Year Goals as an Educator
Description of Your Educational Contributions
SECTION I: Teaching
SECTION II: Assessment Of Learners
SECTION III: Curriculum Development
SECTION IV: Mentoring/Advising
SECTION V: Educational Leadership/Administration
SECTION
VI: Scholarly Approach to Education
Section VII: Products of Educational Scholarship
NAME:
TITLE(S):
PRIMARY EDUCATIONAL ROLE(S):
STATEMENT OF EDUCATIONAL PHILOSOPHY
Insert here, length 1-2 pages
YOUR FIVE-YEAR GOALS AS AN EDUCATOR Back to Top
After reviewing the EP Template, list up to 5 carefully considered goals for your development as an educator in the next 5 years, and be sure that your EP, as it evolves over time, addresses these goals. Your professional development goals should be accompanied by learning strategies to help you achieve them.
Date of last update:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
(Revise or add goals with each EP update.)
DESCRIPTION OF YOUR EDUCATIONAL CONTRIBUTIONS
SECTION I: TEACHINGDescription of Your Teaching Activities In addition to lectures, include teaching that encourages active learning, e.g. interactive lectures, small group sessions, workshops, and clinical precepting. PLEASE FOLLOW THE EXAMPLE BELOW IN COMPLETING THIS GRID. ACCURATE NUMBERS FOR LEARNERS AND HOURS ARE IMPORTANT. Teaching Activities Grid |
| Activity # | Year(s) Taught* | Title or topic of activity | Teaching strategy and context | Where taught (local, reg, nat, internat"l) | Total teaching hours/yr for this activity | Type of learner | Number of learners/year for each activity |
| 1 | |||||||
| 2 | |||||||
| 3 | |||||||
| 4 | |||||||
| Grand Total | |||||||
|
* If your institution requires specific dates, add these. ** If there is a variable number of learners at an activity, provide an average number. Example of Teaching Activities Grid | |||||||
| Activity # | Year(s) Taught* | Title or topic of activity | Teaching strategy and context | Where taught (local, reg, nat, internat"l) | Total teaching hours/yr for this activity | Type of learner | Number of learners/year for each activity |
| 1 | 2000- 2009 | Lecture on Rashes | Repeated lecture in the med student clerkship | department | 1 hour every 8 weeks= 6 hours per year | Medical student | 20 learners |
| 2 | 2007-2009 | Workshop on Career Advancement | Workshop as part of Faculty Development Program series | institution | 4 workshops/yr @ 3 hr each = 12 hrs /yr |
Faculty affiliated with med school | 70 learners |
| 3 | 1998-2009 | Pediatric Inpatient Rotation | Family-centered rounds with bedside teaching, teaching at delivery attendance, admissions, | department | On service about 150 days/yr @ 4 hr/day= 600 hr/yr |
Family medicine residents and 4th year medical students | 40 learners |
| 4 | 2007-2009 | Educator Portfolio Workshop for Junior Faculty | Workshop with interactive small groups | national | 3 hrs/yr | Mid level, junior faculty, fellows | 30 learners |
| Grand Total | 621 hrs/yr |
124 learners/yr |
For the following narrative responses, you may wish to choose 1-2 focal areas of teaching for more detailed comment: Describe the importance, creativity, innovation, and impact of the teaching activities included on the grid above (identify by Activity Number). Evaluation of Your Teaching Provide information below on your teaching evaluations for each course/setting in which you teach (referring to the Activity Numbers from the Teaching Activities Grid, if appropriate). Teaching Evaluation Grid |
| Activity number |
Who and how many evaluated you? (e.g., 25 learners, 2 peers or educational experts) | Describe the process for evaluating your teaching | List evaluations/ evaluation summaries included in Appendix XX: |
Example of Teaching Evaluation Grid |
| Activity number |
Who and how many evaluated you? (e.g., 25 learners, 2 peers or educational experts) | Describe the process for evaluating your teaching | List evaluations/ evaluation summaries included in Appendix XX: |
| 2 | 70 learners | Created an evaluation sheet for feedback from learners that included qualitative and quantitative items | |
| 3 | 40 learners | Residency Program sends standard rotation evaluations through institutional online evaluation system Office of Medical Education sends standard evaluations through in house program |
|
| 4 | 30 learners, two peers | National conference session evaluations plus created my own evaluation – plus/delta form |
| Summarize this teaching evaluation data: If available, provide data on how your teaching evaluations compare to those of your peers (e.g. personal mean score vs mean scores of other departmental faculty). What do you do to collect formative feedback on your teaching? Teaching AwardsPlease list any teaching awards that you have received, with dates and sponsoring institution/organization. Indicate if the award is departmental, institutional, regional, national or international, and describe briefly, including the criterion on which the award is based. Teaching Awards Grid |
| Name | Date Received | Sponsoring organization | Level of award Departmental/Institutional/Regional /National International |
Criterion for award |
Example of Teaching Awards Grid |
| Name | Date Received | Sponsoring organization | Level of award | Criterion for award |
| Aesculapius Teaching award | 2005 | School of Medicine, Stony Brook University Medical Center | Institutional | Given to two or three outstanding educators in the SOM based on educator portfolio and supporting letters |
| APA Teacher of the Year Award | 2009 | Academic Pediatric Association | National | Given to one educator every year based on supporting documentation and personal statement |
|
I. Overview of Section I These questions refer to your teaching activities.
|
Back to Top
SECTION II ASSESSMENT OF LEARNERSDescribe on the grid below the learner assessment methods you employ (use Activity Numbers from the Teaching Activities Grid, if appropriate.) You may evaluate learners in a setting where you do not teach (e.g. OSCEs). Each assessment method should be listed only once, not repetitively for each course or conference. |
Learner Assessment Grid |
| Assessment Method | Teaching activity number | Context of assessment | Your role Development of new tool, implementation of existing tool, analysis / synthesis of results |
Number and types of learners assessed per year | In what category of Miller’s Triangle does this assessment fall?* | How did the results of your learner assessments provide evidence of your teaching effectiveness? |
|||
|
* See Example of Grid and Miller’s Triangle below. Other frameworks for assessment may be used, if preferred. Learner assessment tools included in Appendix XX: 1 2 3 | |||||||||
Example of Learner Assessment Grid |
| Assessment Method | Teaching activity number | Context of assessment | Your role development of new tool, implementation of existing tool,analysis/ synthesis of results |
Number and types of learners assessed per year | In what category of Miller’s Triangle does this assessment fall? | How did the results of your learner assessments provide evidence of your teaching effectiveness? |
| OSCE with an SP dealing with a medico-legal case | Medicine in Contemporary society- Required Longitudinal course across four years of medical school, |
Development of tool Analysis of results | 116 medical students | Shows how | 99% of students passed the "test", suggesting that course met its goals | |
| Direct observation and feedback one on one | 3 | Implementation | 2 students, 1x/mo= 24 students/yr | Does | With feedback, most students achieve competence in history and physical examination skills at the level expected for a third year medical student |
Miller's Triangle | ||
![]() |
Does: Chart audit, portfolio, direct observation (masked/unmasked), also patient outcomes Shows how: High fidelity simulation, OSCE Knows how: Case Presentations, Low fidelity simulations Knows: Multiple-choice question examination | |
| Miller, GE. Acad Med, 65(supp); Sept 1990 | ||
| A CAVEAT: Not all learning is amenable to this kind of concrete evaluation. For example, developing professional skills such as taking responsibility, empowering team members, or being sensitive to patient’s cultural values, are important but not easy to demonstrate or document. Evaluations that are restricted to observable or measurable behaviors may overlook important aspects of physician performance that are best evaluated qualitatively. | ||
Overview of Section II
|
Back to Top
SECTION III: CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENTCurriculum Information Grid |
| Activity number |
Curriculum topic and type (e.g. clerkship module, residency longit experience, fellowship research component) | Type and # of learners per yr | Is it imple-mented? (Yes/No) | Where is it implemented? (dept, instit, regional, national, international) |
Your degree of responsibility (leader or contributor) |
Example of Curriculum Information Grid |
| Activity number |
Curriculum topic and type | Type and # of learners per yr | Is it imple-mented? | Where is it implemented? | Your degree of responsibility |
| 1 | Seminar series (4x1.5 hr) on academic writing | 10 gen peds and adol med fellows/ year | Yes | Dept | Development leader and instructor |
GNOME FRAMEWORK FOR QUALITY OF CURRICULAR DESIGN*Choose one curriculum above as an example of your best effort, and describe this one using the GNOME framework. Curricular Activity selected (Activity number) ___________________________ The GNOME Framework: Indicators of Quality
|
| GNOME* Elements | Evidence of Quality |
| Goals/objectives | |
| Learner needs assessment | |
| Teaching/learning methods | |
| Learner evaluation and feedback | |
| Curriculum/program evaluation |
| * GNOME: G = Goals, N = Needs, O = Objectives, M = Methods, E = Evaluation. [Roberts, K B. Educational principles of community-based education. Pediatrics. 1996; 98(6 Pt 2):1259-1263.] Example of Gnome Framework For Quality of Curricular Design |
| GNOME* Elements | Evidence of Quality |
| Goals/objectives | I have written educational goals and objectives for the fellowship in area of scientific communications, based on my extensive practice as a writing instructor for faculty and fellows. Selected objectives were basis of seminar curriculum. |
| Learner needs assessment | Fellows participated in selection of focal goals; I selected objectives based on my knowledge of fellows writing needs (personal mentoring of Gen Peds fellows and junior faculty). Discussion by fellows helped to guide focus of each seminar. |
| Teaching/learning methods | Methods include didactic presentation, extensive use of authentic examples with interactive discussion, practice with feedback, and distribution of individual practice materials for post-seminar reinforcement. |
| Learner evaluation and feedback | All fellows receive mentoring on their written products (abstracts, papers, grant proposals), with extensive feedback from 2-3 or more faculty on evolving documents. Final evaluation is the peer review system itself. An objective system for analyzing learners’ written products in relation to specific seminar objectives is under development. |
| Curriculum/program evaluation | Seminar evaluations, as well as learner comments during and after the class, are carefully reviewed with every iteration to improve the seminar. |
|
Please add additional narrative details or comments if you wish:
Overview of Section III
|
SECTION IV: MENTORING AND ADVISINGDescription of your Mentoring and Advising Activities Mentoring and Advising Grid |
| Name of mentee or advisee | Period of mentoring advising |
Their role/position when you were their mentor/advisor | Mentoring Topic | Their current position | Mentee achievements* |
| * E.g., papers and grants and well as promotions, leadership positions, and educational awards. Attach a list if needed. < Example of Mentoring and Advising Grid |
Example of Mentoring and Advising Grid |
| Name of mentee or advisee | Period of mentoring/ advising |
Their role/position when you were their mentor/advisor | Mentoring Topic | Their current position | Mentee achievements |
| Jane Doe | 1994-1998 | I was faculty advisor during her residency and chief residency | Academic Career Development | Chief of General Pediatrics, XXX Medical Center | One educational grant from the AAMC to assess curricular changes in the residency program |
| John Smith | 1999-2006 | I mentored him through the APPD for his future role as a program director | Academic Career Development | Residency Program Director, xxx Medical Center | Full accreditation for past two RRC reviews, Received one commendation |
|
In 1-2 pages, describe your mentoring philosophy and the process by which you typically mentor junior professionals:
List of mentees from whom letters are appended: 1 2 3 4 Overview of Section IV.
|
Back to Top
SECTION V: EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP AND ADMINISTRATIONDescription of Educational Leadership and Administrative Activities Examples of past or present leadership roles in education include fellowship/residency/clerkship director or associate director, site director, continuity clinic director, leader of an education subcommittee/curriculum committee, project director on a training grant, and director of a faculty development program. Document your depth of involvement and your role in such programs using the grid below. |
Leadership/Administration Grid |
| Title of program/course(s) that you have directed | Level of program/course or committee Departmental/Institutional/Regional/National/International |
Duration of role in years |
| 1. | ||
| 2. | ||
| 3. | ||
| Name of educational committee(s) that you have led | ||
| 4. | ||
| 5. | ||
| 6. | ||
| Name of educational committee(s) on which you have been a member | ||
| 7. | ||
| 8. | ||
| 9. |
Example of a Leadership/Administration Grid |
| Title of program/course(s) that you have directed | Level of program/course or committee | Duration of role in years |
| Associate Program Director, Pediatric Residency Program, XXX Medical Center | Departmental | Two years ( 1998-2000) |
| Residency Program Director, Pediatric Residency Program, XXX Medical Center | Departmental | Three years ( 2001-2004) |
| Chair, Competency Task force, Social and Community Contexts of Health Care, XXX School of Medicine | Institutional | 2006- present |
| Name of educational committee(s) that you have led | ||
| Chair, Resident Education Committee | Departmental | 2001- present |
| Chair, Medical School Teaching Award Selection Committee | Institutional | Two years, 2005, 2006 |
| Name of educational committee(s) on which you have been a member | ||
| Medical Student Education Committee | Departmental | Five years |
| APA Education Committee | National | Six years |
|
Choose ONE program as an example of your best effort and provide the following: Narrative description of the program and its impact : Evidence of scholarly approach to this role/task: Results of evaluation of your ROLE by outside agencies (e.g., ACGME, LCME, NBME, funding agencies) List of stakeholders for whom letters are appended (e.g., institutional/departmental leaders, learners, peers, community partners): 1 2 3 4 |
Professional Reviewer/Moderator Activities* Grid |
| Activity number |
What was reviewed /moderated (Grants, papers, abstracts) |
Duration of activity in years | Sponsoring organization/institution/agency |
| * Include activities at the NATIONAL level only Example of a Professional Reviewer/Moderator Activities Grid |
| Activity number |
What was reviewed/moderated (Grants, papers, abstracts) |
Duration of activity in years | Sponsoring organization/institution/agency |
| 1 | PAS workshop abstracts review | Four years | Pediatric Academic Societies |
| 2 | HRSA grant review | Two years | Health Research and Services Administration, Federal Agency |
| 3 | Reviewer, Medical Education Journal | One year | International journal focused on medical education |
Overview of Section V
Back to Top |
NOTE ON SECTIONS VI AND VIISections VI and VII on scholarly approach to education and products of educational scholarship are vitally important to promotion as an educator. Although you have included relevant information about your scholarly work under each domain, these two sections allow you to highlight your scholarly approach and compile all products of educational scholarship, so they are easily accessible for peer review. |
SECTION VI: SCHOLARLY APPROACH TO EDUCATIONEvidence of a scholarly approach to education A scholarly approach to education is reflected by
To complete this section for the first time, review your information in Domains I - V above, and consider the primary focus of your educational activities. This area can provide the centerpiece of Section VI. Focal activity that demonstrates a scholarly approach _________________ Describe this activity in 1-2 pages, providibrng evidence of:
|
|
Glassick's six Standards of Excellence in scholarly work (Acad. Med. 2000;75:877-880) provide a useful structure for systematic description of an educational activity:
1. Clear goals: stated purpose, realistic objectives, important questions 2. Adequate preparation: understanding of literature, appropriate skills, needed resources 3. Appropriate methods: choice of methods that match goals, effective use and flexible application of methods 4. Significant results: goals are achieved, results are important, field is advanced 5. Effective presentation: presentation well organized, forums appropriate, message clear and sound 6. Reflective critique: work critically evaluated, supported with good evidence, evaluation used to improve future studies |
| Professional Development in Education List in the grid below any conferences, certification or degree programs, or other educational professional development activities that you have attended as a learner (not a teacher). Include ONLY those that have made a significant impact on your philosophy or practice as an educator. |
Professional Development in Education Grid |
| Name of Program | Sponsoring organization/ institution |
Type of program Education Degree, Educational Professional Development Program, Educational Conference of > one day, Educational Workshop |
Dates | Description of Activity or Program |
Choose ONE activity above to describe its impact on your practice as an educator.
Example of Professional Development in Education Grid |
| Name of Program | Sponsoring organization/ institution |
Type of program | Dates | Description of Activity or Program |
| Educational Scholars Program | Academic Pediatric Association | Three year educational professional development program culminating in a Certification of Excellence in Educational Scholarship | May 2006-May 2009 | 3 years of didactic and experiential learning activities, including a mentored scholarly project producing a peer reviewed product |
| Writing Educational Research Articles | Pediatric Academic Societies | Educational workshop entitled: Educational Scholarship: Writing, Publishing, and Reaping The Rewards | May 2, 2009 | Didactic and interactive learning activities |
Back to Top
SECTION VII: PRODUCTS OF EDUCATIONAL SCHOLARSHIPPublications Related to Education Provide list with full references. Do not include clinical or basic science research publications. Include for each item listed: Article Book Other(specify)______ Peer reviewed Invited Non peer reviewed
Workshops and Peer-reviewed/Invited Presentations on Educational Topics Provide a list with full references. Do not include presentations whose purpose is to report on or teach about clinical or basic science research; include only presentations about education. Provide data for each item listed on: Workshop Didactic presentation Poster Other(specify)________ Invited Peer reviewed Non peer reviewed National/international Regional Institutional Departmental
Other educational products
Educational grants funded List grants and provide for each item listed:
|
Back to Top



